- #Skylake iris pro 1080p
- #Skylake iris pro drivers
- #Skylake iris pro upgrade
- #Skylake iris pro portable
- #Skylake iris pro Pc
#Skylake iris pro upgrade
GPU memory upgrades never amounted to anything beyond a niche, unlike system memory which has been a standard upgrade path for the last 30+ years in desktops, including a vast array of platforms that weren't even x86. In fact, their mobile division bleeds billions of dollars every year. This is deliciously ironic given by extension it implies Iris is dying since Intel has failed to make any kind of impact in phone or tablet space.
#Skylake iris pro Pc
I have to laugh when people go as far as to argue that watercooling integration is somehow realistic and will allow 300W parts to be soldered onto the motherboard, and apparently both the low and high market segments will eagerly swallow the extra costs in exchange for non-upgradable parts, thereby killing the dGPU market.Įven better, many of these same people claim the PC gaming/PC desktop market is dying in other threads.
#Skylake iris pro portable
Iris only makes sense in all-in-one portable devices, or in "charge-more-for-less" devices, like Macs those that think it'll replace dGPUs in desktop space as a viable alternative are deluding themselves. The lower desktop market won't accept those costs, neither will the higher end given they'll always be better served by dGPUs and expandable memory.
Likewise, HBM/eDRAM on a CPU adds costs to that CPU. You may as well predict desktop motherboards will soon be soldered into their cases. The desktop market won't accept or tolerate soldered memory with no upgrade path. Performance was really good, which isn't too surprising considering the use of a $400 external GPU enclosure with a $400 GPU, connected to a NUC that will likely retail for $600 or more.Click to expand.Laptops are portable systems, so by definition lend themselves to the all-in-one category. Intel had Razer's Core on hand, hooked up to Skull Canyon and running a high-end GPU, running Just Cause 3 but at high quality settings.
As a compact PC capable of handling just about any task you might want to run, Skull Canyon is pretty sweet. In addition to the i7-6770HQ, Skull Canyon has a Thunderbolt 3 port, two M.2 SSD slots, and two SO-DIMM slots capable of running up to 32GB of DDR4 memory. Perhaps more interesting are the remaining specs of the Skull Canyon NUC. They're by no means perfect, but they've gotten a lot better-by taking six generations of baby steps.
#Skylake iris pro drivers
It's not just about performance either Intel's graphics drivers have come a long way since 2011, and these days they support DX12 and generally don't have massive rendering errors, even on the latest games.
#Skylake iris pro 1080p
For games that aren't on the cutting edge, the new Iris Pro should be able to hit 1080p with good settings. The problem is that the graphics settings were turned way down, so it was a bit like looking at a game running on Xbox 360. One of the units let us play Just Cause 3, at 1080p, and performance was actually quite decent.
While we couldn't benchmark the solution yet, Intel was showing off their new Skull Canyon NUC, running with the i7-6770HQ. The Skull Canyon NUC measures around 8 x 4 x 1 inches But forget about being 50 times faster than an ancient graphics solution what does it all mean in today's world? Intel is also talking specifically about the performance of the i5-520UM compared to the new i7-6770HQ, which means they're comparing an old 15W part with a new 45W processor. Combined with architectural improvements, the newcomer potentially doubles the performance of the previous generation of Intel Graphics, and Intel is quoting a 50X performance improvement since their first generation HD Graphics from five years back.Ī fifty-fold boost to graphics performance sounds pretty incredible, but what does that mean if we're talking Nvidia and AMD equivalents? Well, it's certainly not going to be at the same level of performance as the GTX 970 or R9 290, which are the minimum spec GPUs for Oculus Rift. Skylake's Iris Pro Graphics packs 72 execution units (EUs), up from a maximum of 48 in Broadwell. Does that all change with Skylake and Iris Pro Graphics? No, but we do see yet another rather substantial increase in processor graphics performance.
0 kommentar(er)
